next
Up: Back to the old Chemistry 2720 index

Chemistry 2720 Spring 1998 Test 1 Solutions

  1. There are several objections to this invention:
    1. The Carnot formula does not consider friction and other sources of loss which, unfortunately, cannot be avoided in real machines. However, the possibility that a very low friction mechanism has been found which makes the efficiency nearly equal to the theoretical maximum cannot entirely be excluded.
    2. A Carnot engine is the most efficient type of engine possible. Unless the inventor's engine is just a Carnot engine (in which case it may not be sufficiently original to merit patent protection), it must be less efficient than a Carnot engine. This point must be determined by inspecting the patent application.
    3. The engine is claimed to produce power at a reasonable rate. The Carnot formula applies strictly only to reversible engines. However, a reversible engine works infinitely slowly so it would produce no power. Since any irreversible engine (producing work at a reasonable rate) must be less efficient than a reversible engine, the inventor's claim is invalid.
    Note: It wasn't necessary to be this thorough to get full marks.
  2. To measure a heat capacity, we have to measure how much heat is required to change the temperature by a known amount. Here's one way to do it:
    1. Place the sample in a pot of boiling water. Leave it there for 10 minutes. We know that the water is at its boiling point and, after leaving adequate time for thermal equilibration, the brass should also reach this temperature. (By the way, the boiling temperature of water varies with altitude so it's not necessarily exactly tex2html_wrap_inline267 .)
    2. Meanwhile, carefully weigh a sample of room-temperature water into an insulated vessel. Place a thermometer in the water and measure its temperature. Make sure that the temperature is stable, neither rising nor falling with time. Call this temperature tex2html_wrap_inline269 .
    3. Remove the brass from the boiling water and place it quickly into the insulated vessel with the water.
    4. Record how the temperature changes over time. Stop the experiment when the temperature of the water stabilizes. Call this temperature tex2html_wrap_inline271 .
    5. Dry and weigh the sample of brass.
    Because the container was insulated, this is a simple heat balance problem:

    eqnarray13

  3. We need to calculate the energy required to warm 568mL (one pint) of beer from 4 to tex2html_wrap_inline273 . First, use the approximate density (1g/ml) to find that one pint of beer weighs approximately 568g. Now, from the specific heat capacity,

    displaymath275

    Using the conversion factor of 4.184J/cal, we find that

    displaymath277

    Warm beer provides 196kcal of energy per pint but 19kcal must be used up warming it to body temperature so the net energy gain is only 177kcal.

    1. At constant pressure, tex2html_wrap_inline279 . Since the heat per mole of HgS is required, the easiest way to do this problem is to rewrite the reaction so that it involves one stoichiometric equivalent of this solid:

      displaymath281

      Then

      eqnarray53

      Since tex2html_wrap_inline283 , this represents 74.6kJ/mol of heat produced by the reaction.

    2. At constant volume, tex2html_wrap_inline285 . Since E=H-PV, tex2html_wrap_inline289 . If we only consider the gases and treat them as ideal, we get

      displaymath291

      Again, we use the version of the chemical equation in which HgS has a stoichiometric coefficient of 1 since we want to know how much heat is produced per mole of this compound. In this case, tex2html_wrap_inline293 . Accordingly,

      eqnarray71

      Thus, at constant volume, 73.4kJ of heat is produced for each mole of HgS consumed by the reaction.

    3. I will continue to use the form of the chemical equation given on this page. It doesn't matter how you write the equation provided it's properly balanced and you're consistent.

      First, calculate tex2html_wrap_inline295 , from tables:

      eqnarray83

      Now compute the free energy change when tex2html_wrap_inline297 . Note that the solids all have an activity of 1:

      eqnarray97

      Since tex2html_wrap_inline299 , the reaction is spontaneous.

    1. We are interested in the combustion of methanol

      displaymath301

      at tex2html_wrap_inline303 . To get the enthalpy change at this temperature, we need to use a path for which we have all the requisite information. Consider the sequence

      eqnarray122

      Step 2 is just the combustion at tex2html_wrap_inline305 for which we have data. In step 1,

      eqnarray143

      In step 3,

      eqnarray157

      Thus for the overall reaction at the target temperature, tex2html_wrap_inline307 . Per liter, this is

      displaymath309

    2. The internal combustion engine produces work from heat (it burns methanol) so it's a heat engine. Its efficiency is

      displaymath311

      Note that we have to convert the temperatures to Kelvin before using this formula.

      Burning methanol at a rate of 2L/h, it produces heat at a rate of 34.4MJ/h (computed using the answer to the previous part of this question). Thus

      displaymath313

    3. If instead of burning the methanol it is oxidized isothermally, free energy sets the maximum work available and thus the maximum power which can be developed. First, calculate tex2html_wrap_inline295 :

      eqnarray185

      The free energy change under atmospheric conditions is then

      eqnarray202

      Now use the density and molar mass to convert this to tex2html_wrap_inline317 . Finally, use the methanol consumption rate to calculate the power developed: 9.83kW. Note that this is more than double the power developed by the heat engine.


next
Up: Back to the old Chemistry 2720 index

Marc Roussel
Sat Feb 14 19:32:41 MST 1998