Travelling to a star is irrelevant. The issue
is only one of travelling to a location 500 light-years away.
I am beginning to feel a bit uneasy about this book, and others
like it, that describe the implications of various equations without
giving any sense of what the equations might be or how they were
derived.
I really must do more reading about Maxwell and his four equations!
Typing Maxwell electromagnetism equations gives numerous web sites,
but most are genuinely too technical for me. One of the difficulties
was that the equations mentioned involved tensors. I am not sure
what they are. I can recall some math majors discussing a course
they were taking on tensor analysis, but I never took that course.
A little more work with google and I Learned that a tensor is a
multi-dimensiional vector. Simple!
While googling "Albert Einstein 1905" I found a reference to a
book that is supposed to provide a line by line analysis of Einstein's
1905 paper on special relativity. A quci check of the U of L library
indicates we have it. Now to see what it looks like!
I disagree with Gott on page 46. I agree that an astronaut's heart
should appear to beat more slowly on a fast moving spaceship (as
viewed
by me, not on the spaceship) but if I carry this to a very very
fast spaceship then the heart would almost come to a halt and this
is not biologically possible without dying. The relativity equations
are fine for inanimate objects, but I do not think they apply to
living objects. Interesting!! This means that all of our interpretations
about space/time travel are hooey! Or I am missing some critical
point.
I would like to see all of the theorems that have been derived
from Einstein's two postulates laid out in a manner similar to
Euclid's Elements.
The idea of an invariant square of separation is a new one for
me.
6:05 am I think
I need a break and want to mull some of this over. It is a bit
overwhelming. But very exciting. |