The second quote is an important one. The
idea is that some societal patterns may be the result of the mathematics
of complexity rather than the underlying reality of human interactions.
The Milgram phrase refers to the idea that any two people can
be connected by a path of friends that only involves about 6 links.
Very counter-intuitive!
One of the delightful aspects of the story about Watts and Strogotz
is that it is contemporary. It is so rare to encounter mathematics
in the press, or in textbooks, that refers to something recent.
Other subjects are not like that. Why is mathematics so pre-occupied
with "old" math? A partial answer may have to do with the specialist
nature of the subject. Only the very old topics are accessible
to novices.
The difference between different levels of observation raises
the idea of emergence. Each level has properties that one could
not infer from the other levels. But it also refers to something
else I read a long time ago (and cannot
recall
clearly!)
that has
something
to do with different levels. Maybe it was something to do with
systems theory and possibly Bertalanfy. ??? . levels of organization
... about 8 ... cell - organism - organization -culture. Is this
also how we move from brain to mind?
The above lead to a search that resulted in a discussion of proteins.
What is a protein? Googling informs me that it is a large molecule
made of various amino acids (which are also large molecules) that
are found in living matter. I wonder how long I will remember that?
Perhaps a long time.
The quote on mass extinctions is an aside, and it also rings a
(faint) bell. Now to find out more about them. Easily done. The
BBC site is excellent.
I like the way different ideas crop up spontaneously while reading
and that I can pursue them using Google at the moment they occur! |