hist5 |
An
Example of a "Learning Process" Journal (using the 2 colored
box format) |
|
October
28, 2004 |
Book: Hegemony or Suvival: America's Quest for
Global Dominance.
Source: New York: Henry Holt, 2003.
|
6:15 am Thursday. I hope to make substantial
progress on my notes for this book this morning. |
Book: Hegemony or Survival: America's
Quest for Global Dominance.
Chapter 6 Dilemmas of Dominance [p. 145
- 156]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- The globe appears to be moving toward a tripolar order
consisting of the US, Europe and Asia with a concommitant
concern in the US that both Europe and Asia may seek a
more independent course.
|
This was a very short chapter
with no sub-headings.
|
Chapter 7 Cauldron of Animosities
[p. 157 - 185]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- In the Middle East, Israel's military power, strongly supported
by the US, is considered "dangerous in the extreme".
Structure of the chapter:
- US-Israel Relations: Origins and Maturation
- Camp David II and Beyond: Toward a "Permanent Neocolonial
Dependency"
US-Israel Relations: Origins and Maturation
- "Israel has military forces that are off the spectrum of
societies comparable in other dimensions." [p. 159]
- "Israel also has a close military alliance with the other
regional military power, Turkey. The US-Turkey-Israel alliance
is sometimes called "the axis of evil" in the Middle East."
[p. 159]
- "After World War II, a high priority of US policy was to
ensure its control over a region of such great material wealth
and strategic significance." [p. 161]
- "US intelligence expects Gulf energy resources to become
even more significant in the years ahead, hence also the drive
to maintain control." [p. 162]
- "Until recently, the only fully reliable military base nearby
was the British-held island of Diego Garcia, from which the
inhabitants were expelled. The US still refuses them the right
of return, overruling decisions of the British courts; the
issue is unknown in the US, much like the case of Okinawa."
[p. 162]
- "The crisis in Indonesia was resolved by a huge massacre,
mainly of landless peasants ..." [p. 165]
- "Israel's choices over the past thirty years have reduced
its options considerably; on its present course, it has virtually
no alternative to serving as a US base in the region and complying
with US demands." [p. 165]
- "Israel recognized at once that with the Arab deterrent removed,
it could intensify its expansion into the occupied territories
and attack its northern neighbour, as it proceeded to do in
1978 and 1982, continuing to occupy parts of Lebanon for almost
twenty years. The 1982 invasion and its immediate aftermath
left some 20,000 dead; according to Lebanese sources, the toll
in the following years was about 25,000. The topic is of little
concern in the West ... So matters continued through eighteen
bloody years of Israeli atrocities in Lebanon, rarely with
even a thin pretext of self-defense" [p. 167]
- "... the goal of the 1982 invasion 'was to install a friendly
regime and destroy Mr. Arafat's Palestinian Liberation Organization'
" [p. 168]
- "From then to the present the US has blocked the possibility
of a diplomatic settlement in the terms accepted by virtually
the entire world..." [p. 168]
Camp David II and Beyond: Toward a "Permanent Neocolonial Dependency"
- "During the Bush II-Sharon years, the prospects for a diplomatic
solution have declined further. Israel has expanded its settlement
programs, with continued US backing." [p. 172]
- " 'In virtually every Israeli settlement, colonization efforts
are proceeding apace,' leading to 'revolutionary changes in
patterns of transportation and access' aimed at 'consolidating
Israel's ability to secure a permanent hold over these lands."
[p. 172]
- "In contrast, the dynamic for Palestinians is just the opposite
- an ever-increasing network of barricades, obstacles, patrol
roads, and prohibitions that isolate them from settlements,
from each other, and from places of work, compromising their
ability to lead normal lives and impoverishing an entire national
community." [p. 172 - 173]
|
Chapter 8 Terrorism and Justice:
Some Useful Truisms [p. 187 - 216]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- The US does not apply to itself the standards it imposes
on other countries.
Structure of the chapter:
- Truisms and Terror
- The Art of "Disappearing" Unwanted Facts
- Truisms and Just War Theory
- Confronting Terror
Truisms and Terror
- "A few simple truths:
- actions are evaluated in terms of the range of likely
consequences
- the principle of universality: we apply to ourselves
the same standards we apply to others" [p. 187]
- [The above two principles] "... are rejected almost without
exception." [p. 187]
- "The actual consequences of an action may be highly significant,
but they do not bear on the moral evaluation of the action."
[p. 187]
- "It is traditional for states to call their own terrorism
'counterterror' " [p. 189]
- "... terror is primarily a weapon of the powerful." [p. 189]
- "Another problem with the official definitions of terror
is that it follows from them that the US is a leading terrorist
state. That much is hardly controversial, at least among thse
who believe that we should pay some attention to such institutions
as the International Court of Justice or the UN Security Council,
or mainstream scholarship." [p. 189]
- "To learn about such matters one has to wander into forbidden
territory: the historical and documentary record, or marginalized
critical literature." [p. 191]
The Art of "Disappearing" Unwanted Facts
- "Keeping to convention, these analyses portray the US as
a benign victim, defending itself from the terror of others:
the Vietnamese ..., the Nicaraguans ..., Libyans ..., Iranians
..." [p. 194]
- "... the plague of US-backed state terror that spread through
Latin America in the 1960's peaked in Central America in the
1980's..." [p. 194]
- In the Middle East, the "worst single atrocity during the
1980's was the Israeli invasion of Lebanon in 1982." [p. 194]
- The US media routinely "protects its readers from the
complicity of their own government". [p. 197]
Truisms and Just War Theory
- "World opinion strongly favored diplomatic-judicial measures
over military action [to apprehend the people responsible for
9-11]" [p. 200]
- The US begfan bombing Afghanistan in late 2001, when "there
was overwhelming opposition to Washington's actual policies."
[p. 200]
- "In late October 2001, after three weeks of intense bombing,
1,000 Afghan leaders gathered in Peshawar, ... all committed
to overthrowing the Taliban regime, ... unanimously 'urged
the US to stop the air raids' and appealed to the international
media to call for an end to the 'bombing of innocent people'.
They urged that other means be adopted to overthrow the hated
Taliban regime, a goal they believed could be achieved fithout
further death and destruction." [p. 201]
- "It would be hard to find anyone who accepts the doctrine
that massive bombing is a legitimate response to terrorist
crimes." [p. 204]
- "Clinton's missile attack on the al-Shifa pharmaceutical
plant in Sudan in 1998, which led to 'several tens of thousands'
of deaths...' [p. 206]
Confronting Terror
- "Though terrorism is rightly feared everwhere and is indeed
an intolerable 'return to barbarism', it is not surprising
that perceptions about its nature differ rather sharply at
opposite ends of the guns." [p. 208 - 209]
- "Those concerned to reduce the threaat of terror ... will
distinguish carefully between the terrorist networks themselves
and the larger community that provides a resevoir from which
radical terrorist cells can sometimes draw. That community
includes the poor and oppressed." [p. 209]
- "... 'unless the social, political, and economic conditions
that spawned Al Qaeda and other associated groups are addressed,
the United States and its allies in Western Europe and elsewhere
will continue to be targeted by Islamist terrorists.' Accordingly,
'the US should, for its own self-protection, expand efforts
to reduce the pathology of hatred before it mutates into even
greater danger,' seeking to 'moderate ... conditions that breed
violence and terrorism.' " [p. 209 - 210]
- "... But their 'support base' has to be approached in radically
different ways: by considering grievances and, if they are
legitimate, addressing them in a serious way." [p. 210]
- "Northern Ireland ... is vastly improved over the days when
Britain ignored legitimate grievances in favor of force." [p.
213]
- "The basic reason ... was the perception that the US supports
corrupt and brutal governments and is 'opposing political or
economic progress' in order 'to protect its interest in Near
East oil.' " [p. 214]
|
Chapter 9 A Passing Nightmare?
[p. 217 - 237]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- Many countries (US, Israel, Russia, China) realized that
they could use 9-11 as a pretext for further terrorism and
aggression.
- "missile defense isn't really meant to protect America.
It's a tool for global dominance." [p. 227]
|
This has been a very sobering
book to read, but I am glad I have made a few notes. I am resolved
to do more reading on political history since 1945. |
Reminder: each "Learning" session has a new web page.
|