hist3 |
An
Example of a "Learning Process" Journal (using the 2 colored
box format) |
|
October
26, 2004 |
Book: Hegemony or Suvival: America's Quest for
Global Dominance.
Source: New York: Henry Holt, 2003.
|
Rats. I had to shut down and lost my notes
for the last hour! Now to try again. |
Book: Hegemony or Survival: America's
Quest for Global Dominance.
Chapter 3 The New Era of Enlightenment[p. 51
- 72]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- Three facts need to be recognized as we enter a new millenium:
- "... the record of terror and criminal atrocities
carried out with the decisive support of the reigning
superpower and its allies in very recent years, continuing
without noticeable change, and suppressed as effectively
as in the past within the prevailing intelletual culture"
- "... over the last millennium, 'ware has been the
dominant activity of European states"
- "... the central, tragic fact is simple: coercion
works; those who apply substantial force to their fellows
get compliance, and from that compliance draw the multiple
advantages of money, goods, deference, and access to
pleasures denied to less powerful people." [p. 51 -
52]
Structure of the chapter:
- East Timor and Kosovo
- The Need for Colonization
- Protecting Naughty Children From Infection
East Timor and Kosovo
- "In 1999, Indonesia escalated the atrocities in
the territory they had invaded in 1975, killing perhaps
200,000 people with the military and diplomatic support
of the US and Britain, assisted by 'intentional ignorance'
" [p. 53]
- "Clinton reversed the 25-year policy of support for Indonesia's
crimes in East Timor, and informed the Indonesian military
that Washington would no longer directly support their
crimes. They immediately withdrew from the territory, allowing
an Australian-led UN peacekeeping force to enter unopposed."
[p. 54]
- "The lesson was crystal clear ... It would have sufficed
to withdraw from participation for some of the worst crimes
of the late twentieth century to have come to a halt."
[p. 54]
- "Kosovo was an ugly place before the NATO bombing, with
an estimated 2,000 killed on all sides during the preceding
year." ... there were no changes until after the bombing
began, when it got much worse. [p. 55]
- "What mattered most was the need to impose NATO's will
on a leader whose defiance, first in Bosnia and then in
Kosovo, was undermining the credibility of American and
European diplomacy and of NATO's willpower." [p. 57]
- "Clinton's resort to force in Bosnia in 1995 and his
bombing of Serbia in 1999 were 'not, as claimed, to put
a stop to ethnic cleansing or in response to claims of
conscience, but to preempt threats to the cohesion of NATO
and the credibility of American power.' " [p. 57 - 58]
The Need for Colonization
- "Human rights organizations and the State Department
agree that the overwhelming majority of atrocities in Colombia
can be attributed to the military and paramilitaries, the
'sixth division' of the five-division Colombian army. ...
The proportion of atrocities attributed to the paramilitaries
has been increasing as crimes are privatized ... a familiar
development elsewhere as well: Serbia used private militias
in the former Yugoslavia, as did Indonesia in East Timor,
and Turkey in the southeast." [p. 60]
- "Fumigation (in Colombia) is being taken over by 'private'
companies consisting of US military officers under contract
to the Pentagon, also a pattern that is worldwide, and
useful for evading accountability." [p. 60]
- "Why do we persist in our own crimes, either directly
or through crucial support for murderous clients?" [p.
61]
Protecting Naughty Children From Infection
- "In its advocacy of the Munroe Doctrine the United States
considers its own interests." [p. 64]
- "The doctrine could not yet be implemented fully because
of the balance of world power, though Wilson did secure US
domination of the Caribbean region by force ... and was able
to move somewhat beyond, driving the British enemy out of
oil-rich Venezuela and supporting the vicious and corrupt
disctator Juan Vicente Gomez, who opened the country to US
corporations. ... By 1928 Venezuela had become the world's
leading oil exporter, with US companies in charge. The story
continues right to the front pages of 2003, with enormous
poverty in a country of rich resources and potential, yielding
great wealth to foreign investors and small sector of the
population.
- "Haitians were 'little more than primitive savages' according
to Franklin Delano Roosevelt, who claimed to have rewritten
the Haitian Constitution during Wilson's military occupation
- so as to permit US corporations to take over Haiti's land
and resources after its recalcitrant Parliament had been
sent packing by the marines." [p. 65]
- "... when Iran's conservative parliamentary government
sought to gain control of its own resources, the US and Britain
instigated a military coup to install an obedient regime
that ruled with terror for twenty-five years." [p. 65]
- " 'Latin Americans are convinced that the first beneficiaries
of the development of a country's resources should be the
people of that country,' That was unacceptable: the 'first
beneficiaries' must be US investors. ... The US therefore
imposed an "Economic Charter for the America's" designed
to eliminate economic nationalism 'in all its forms'. " [p.
66]
- "... the primary threat posed by Communism was the economic
transformation of the Communist countries 'in ways that reduce
their willingness and ability to complement the industrial
economies of the West,' " [p. 66]
|
I find the discussion of East
Timor to be confusing. They were not invaded and the force
that did arrive was under the jurisdiction of the UN.
The claim that Kosovo is now likely to support
a "European Taliban" since radical Islamic groups have taken
over the distribution of food, clothing and shelter is also
new to me.
I need to check google for some history on Venezuela from
about 1900 - 2000.
http://www.lonelyplanet.com/destinations/south_america/venezuela/history.htm
It is sobering to think that one of the largest oil reserves
is the Athabasca tar sands. It is also sobering to think of
the stock market, and in particular mutual funds that support
companies that plunder third world countries.
I need to check a bit more about Haiti's history since 1940...
I need to check a bit about Iran and how the Shah came to
power. ...
I need to check out "The Economic Charter for the America's"
... |
Chapter 4 Dangerous Times [p.
73 - 108]
What is the main idea of this chapter?
- History is crafted by the powerful.
Structure of the chapter:
- One Word Away From Nuclear War
- International Terrorism and Regime Change: Cuba
- Successful Defiance
- Guiding Principles
- International Terrorism and Regime Change: Nicaragua
One Word Away From Nuclear War
- "... a principle that must be close to a historical universal
of intellectual culture: We are 'good' (whoever we happen
to be), and they are 'evil' if they stand in our way."
[p. 76]
- "The subordination of the ideological system to power
ensures that virtually any action - international terrorism
... , overt aggression ... , participation in mass slaughter
to destroy the only mass-based political party ...., will
either be dispatched to oblivion or reshaped into an act
of legitimate self-defense or an act of benevolence that
perhaps went astray." [p. 76]
- Adlai Stevenson's "moment" (when he showed images of
missiles in Cuba) is not balanced by similar "moments"
when the Russians showed images of missiles in Turkey.
[p. 77]
International Terrorism and Regime Change: Cuba
- "Eisenhower's March 1960 plan called for the overthrow
of Castro in favor of a regime 'more devoted to the true
interests of the Cuban people and more acceptable to the
US' ". [p. 82]
- "Kennedy was aware that allies 'think we are slightly
demented' on the subject of Cuba, a perception that persists
to the present." [p. 82]
- "After the crisis ended, Kennedy renewed the terrorist
campaign. ... 'only once in these nearly thousand pages
of documentation did a U.S. official raise something that
resembled a faint moral objection to U.S.-government sponsored
terrorism' " [p. 85]
- "US economic warfare against Cuba has been strongly condemned
in virtually every relevant international forum." [p. 89]
Successful Defiance
- "In July 1961 the CIA warned that 'the extensive influence
of Castroism is not a function of Cuban power ... Castro's
shadow looms large because social and economic conditions
throughout Latin America invite opposition to ruling authority
and encourage agitation for radical change' for which Castro's
Cuba provided a model." [p. 89]
- "Kennedy feared that Russian aid might make Cuba a 'showcase'
for development, giving the Soviets the upper hand throughout
Latin America." [p. 90]
- "Outrage over defiance goes far back in American history."
[p. 90]
Guiding Principles
- "The world did not suddenly become extraordinarily dangerous
on 9-11, requiring 'new paradigms' that dismantle international
law and institutions and grant the White HOuse the power
to disregrad the domestic rule of law." [p. 91]
International Terrorism and Regime
Change: Nicaragua
- "The attack against Nicaragua was one of the highest
priorities of the war on terror launched as the Reagan
administration came into office in 1981." [p. 96]
- "Washington's terrorist war had reversed the considerable
economic growth and social progress that followed the overthrow
of the US-backed Somoza dictatorship, driving the highly
vulnerable economy to disaster." [p. 98]
- "In 1986, the World Court found in Nicaragua's favor,
... condemning Washington for 'unlawful use of force' -
international terrorism". ... The decision had little detectable
effect. [p. 99]
- "Following the US rejection of the World Court orders,
Nicaragua ... took its case to the Security Council, which
endorsed the court's judgement and called on all states
to observe international law. The US vetoed the resolution,
Nicaragua then approached the General Assembly, which passed
a similar resolution with only the US, Israel and El Salvador
opposed, ... Little of this was even reported, and the
matter has disappeared from history." [p. 102]
- "Latin Americans ... 'know better than perhaps most people
that the US government is one of the biggest sponsors of
terrorism.' " [p. 108]
|
Reminder: each "Learning" session has a new web page.
|