Learning: The Journey of a Lifetime

Journals as an Aid to Learning

History

hist2

An Example of a "Learning Process" Journal (using the 2 colored box format)

 
October 25, 2004

Book: Hegemony or Suvival: America's Quest for Global Dominance.

Source: New York: Henry Holt, 2003.

I finished reading this book a couple of weeks ago, but have procrastinated on making notes. Now to work on this. This will require some flexibility on my part as this is a different type of book: it is not a textbook as much as it is a commentary on present US foreign policy. What is a good structure for such a book?

Book: Hegemony or Suvival: America's Quest for Global Dominance.

Chapter 2 Imperial Grand Strategy [p. 11 - 49]

What is the main idea of this chapter?

  • "... by fall 2002 was the declared intention of the most powerful state in history to maintain its hegemony through the threat or use of military force. ... the doctrine dismisses international law and institutions as of 'little value' " [p. 11]
  • "The new imperial grand strategy presents the United States [as] a revisioinist state seeking to parlay its momentary advantages into a world order in which it runs the show,' prompting others to find ways to 'work around, undermine, contain and retaliate against U.S. power." The strategy threatens to 'leave the world more dangerous and divided - and the United States less secure." [p. 11-12]

Structure of the chapter:

  • Enforcing Hegemony
  • New Norms of International Law
  • The Rule of Law
  • International Law and Institutions
  • Elite Concerns
  • Intentional Ignorance

Enforcing Hegemony

  • "The imperial grand strategy asserts the right of the United States to undertake "preventive ware" at will. ... Preventive war falls within the category of war crimes." [p. 12]
  • "Some defenders of the strategy recognize that it runs roughshod over international law but see no problem in that." [p. 13]
  • "Hence the refined version of the grand strategy effectivley grants Washington the right of arbitrary aggression." [p. 14]
  • "Contempt for international law and institutions was particularly flagrant in the Reagan-Bush years. ... the US reserved the right to act 'unilaterally when necessary,' including the 'unilateral use of military power' to defend such vital interests as 'ensuring uninhibited access to key markets, energy supplies, and strategic resources.' " [p. 15]

New Norms of International Law

  • "From the first moments of the propoganda offensive, it was apparent that the pronouncements lacked credibility. 'This administration is capable of any lie ... in order to advance its war goal in Iraq." [p. 18]
  • "The government-media propoganda assault had its effects. Within weeks , some 60 percent of Americans came to regard Saddam Hussein as 'an immediate threat to the US' ... at home it succeeded brilliantly in linking the war on Iraq with the trauma of September 11." [p. 18]
  • "After the invasion of Iraq was declared a success, it was publicly recognized that one motive for the war had been to establish the imperial grand strategy as a new norm. ...'we will not hesitate to act alone, if necessary, to exercise our right of self-defense by acting pre-emptively,' now that the norm has been established." [p 21]
  • "Peoples and regimes will have to change the way they see the world 'from a view based on the United Nations and international law to one based on an identification' with Washington's agenda." [p. 21]
  • "The Kosovo bombing in particular is understood by distinguished authorities to have established the norm or resort to force without Security Council authorization." [p. 22]
  • There have been two examples of intervention by force to stop huge atrocities:
  • India's invasion of East Pakistan in 1971
  • Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia in 1978

The Rule of Law

  • "The grand strategy extends to domestic US law. ... the Bush administration claimed, and exercised, the right to declare people - including US citizens - to be 'enemy combatants' or 'suspected terrorists' and to imprison them without charge or access to lawyers or family ..." [p. 26]
  • "The Red Cross strongly protested the refusal of the US command to allow it access to prisoners of war, in violation of the Geneva Conventions, and to captured civilians." [p. 27]
  • "Analogies have been drawn to the darkest days of McCarthyism, but these new proposals are more extreme. The plan also extends powers of surveillance without court authorization, permits secret arrests, and further protects the state from the scrutiny of citizens." [p. 27]

International Law and Institutions

  • " 'The primacy of law over force that has been a major thread of American foreign policy since the end of World War II' disappears from the new strategy. Also 'all but disappeared' are the international institutions 'that extend the reach of law' ... From now on, force reigns, and the US will exercise that force as it sees fit." [p. 28]
  • " ... 'the national interest,' a technical term referring to the special interests of domestic sectors that are in a position to determine policy." [p. 29]
  • :When the UN fails to serve as 'an instrument of American unilateralsim' on issues of elite concern, it is dismissed." [p. 29]
  • "France's threat to veto a UN declaration of war was bitterly condemned. ... In general, threat of veto by others is a scandal, revealing the 'failure of diplomacy' and the miserable behavior of the UN. ... Routine resort to the veto by the world champion is generally ignored or downplayed." [p. 31]
  • "... for much of the world the US is 'becoming the rogue superpower, [considered] the single greatest external threat to their societies.' ... coalitions might arise to counterbalance the rogue superpower, with threatening implications." [p. 37]

Intentional Ignorance

  • "But to reassure ourselves that the powerful are motivated by 'elevated ideals' and 'altruism' in the quest of 'stability and rightousness' we have to adopt the stance called 'intnetional ignorance' " [p. 43

The first few quotes were from a "well-known international affairs specialist, John Ikenberry. I googled him and obtained

http://www.theglobalist.com/DBWeb/AuthorBiography.aspx?AuthorId=153

He does have impressive credentials, plus I have just learned about a new web site.

I then googled Richard Falk: http://www.transnational.org/forum/meet/2002/Falk_AgainstIraqWar.html

India's invasion of East Pakistan in 1971:

http://timesofindia.indiatimes.com/articleshow/44591247.cms

http://globalwebpost.com/genocide1971/

Vietnam's invasion of Cambodia in 1979:

http://www.bharat-rakshak.com/MONITOR/ISSUE3-3/bakshi.html

Reminder: each "Learning" session has a new web page.

Last Page
Next Page

History Index