Thus, for this experiment, it is claimed that the product can be as small as . On the other hand, . The claimed accuracy of the experiment is much greater than is permitted by the uncertainty principle. The author of the article has either made a mistake or has found a way around a fundamental limitation of quantum mechanics. The former is considerably more likely.
> psi := (n,L,x) -> sqrt(2/L)*sin(n*Pi*x/L);
The ground state of a particle in a box is the n=1 state.
The probability is
> int(psi(1,L,x)^2,x=3*L/5..2*L/3);
> evalf(");
> int(psi(3,L,x)*x^15*psi(3,L,x),x=0..L);
> evalf(");
The last term is zero because after applying the commutator simplification rules, it can only produce terms involving . We apply the commutator rule for products to the other two terms:
If the commutator of two observables is zero, they can be measured simultaneously without one measurement interfering with the other. We say that two such observables are compatible.
Normalization is required for to be interpretable as a probability density.
Unfortunately, this kind of reasoning only works for a very small number of quantum mechanical problems.