Mass media effects -- Lecture #8

Hovland, Janis & Kelley's persuasion findings

Background

"Magic Bullet Theory"

  • mass media have strong effects
  • these effects are "universal"

  • previous findings (1940s)

  • media effects are limited,
  • they happen to some people,
  • and depend on importance of issue

  • the "Magic Bullet Theory" may be dead, but let's search for the "Magic Keys"!

    Yale "Communication and Persuasion" studies

    Return to Yale
    got $370.000 Rockefeller grant,
    studied Persuasion -- "any attempt to change a person's mind"

  • source variables (credibility)
  • message variables (one or two sides)
  • channel variables (face-to-face, media)
  • receiver variables (intelligence, gender)
  • fear appeals (low, medium, high)

  • Two-sided provided better "inoculation"
    Explicit conclusions for "low motivation"
    Group norms can affect public attitudes
    "Counter-attitudinal advocacy" is effective
    in the "sleeper effect" people remember the message, but forget the source
  • [film advertising]

  • Overall:
    short-term opinion change

  • on not-very-important topics
  • is easy to achieve

  • long-term opinion change
  • on important topics,
  • or behavioral change
  • is hard to achieve

  • The end

  • 1960 -- Hovland diagnosed with cancer
  • 1961 -- age 60: worked with students, went home to his bathtub and drowned himself

  • Evaluation of Hovland's contributions
    "the largest single contribution to the field" (Schramm)
    lots about "single, conrolled exposure"

  • [Lazarsfeld - maybe no exposure]

  • His followers

    William J. McGuire
    Examined "stages of change"

  • exposure, attention, comprehension, yielding, memory, behavior

  • Return to Mass Media effects syllabus

    On to lecture #9